NETWORK18

News Videos Blogs

FACE THE NATION

Font Size A+A-

Shooting in dark: India hostage to security crisis?

TimePublished on Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 07:57, Updated on Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 08:38 in Nation section

GUNS AND POSES: The Army used risky and bloody option but that was the only one it had.

GUNS AND POSES: The Army used risky and bloody option but that was the only one it had.


      

ibnlive.com is on mobile now. Read news, watch videos
be a Citizen Journalist. Log on to m.ibnlive.com NOW!

Photogallery

Find us on Facebook | Join IBNLive community

Stay ahead with G-Talk Buddy | Click now!

Ads by Google
Page 2 of 2

Security forces tried to get a maulvi (Muslim cleric) on Wednesday morning to speak and convince the terrorists to surrender but when that failed no further attempts were made to get a negotiator. Was that an error?

European and American security forces have a “tremendous body of knowledge” in dealing with hostage situations, said Herman. This knowledge doesn’t come from weaponry but from the experience of police agencies and security forces in dealing with terrorists and criminals.

“It is important for India to exchange information with law enforcement agencies and militaries around the world to gather what are the best strategies to tackle such situations,” said Herman.

“Professionals in this area believe that innocents must not be harmed. The fact that the operation in Jammu went on for 20 hours is not relevant—the fact is that the innocent people were rescued. If that takes 48 hours or 60 hours so be it.”

Politics takes hostage policy

The UPA Government had planned to put in place a new and tough anti-hijack policy in February 2008. It promised to follow a no-negotiation policy with hijackers and death penalty for them.

The Government said it had the right to shoot down a hostile plane if there is evidence that the plane is likely to be used as missile. It promised better coordination among security agencies during a hostage or hijack crisis. The proposals were so radical that there was an uproar in Parliament and the Opposition refused to back the policy.

India is good at conceptualising but not as good in executing concepts. “The (anti-hijack) policy is good but sufficient organisational structures have not been put in place to give effect to that policy,” said Kanwal.

“We forget that the Indian Army’s primary task is defending the borders. Getting involved in internal security duties, like counter-insurgency operations, is a secondary task. Hostage rescue is an extremely specialised operation and it needs to be undertaken by specially trained and equipped forces,” he said.

There is no “one-size fits all” solution for hostage crises. “India needs to have trained personnel at all levels to deal with such situations. You have to study all variables and cases around the world to create a system. Somebody has to be in charge,” said Herman.

Autocratic nations can deal with hostage situations brazenly but democracies can’t do that. India has to care for the innocents before it gets terrorists.

SMS poll on: are we ill equipped to deal with hostage crisis situation?

Yes 71 per cent, No 29 per cent

Ads by Google
Related Ads:

About Us | Disclaimer | Careers @ IBN | RSS | Podcast | Contact Us | Feedback | Advertise With Us

© 2008 IBNLive.com India. All Rights Reserved. A Web18 Venture